Buy it here Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator 2: Pacific Theater for $48.09
Product
Combat Flight Simulator 2, you’ll expereince an era of history that defines the future – you will find a fighter pilot in World War Amazon now. com review
Combat Flight Simulator 2 is a dream come true f? r historic flight sim fans. Excellent graphics, great sound effects and adjustable realism settings make CFS2 a thrilling and Internet outage in the unfriendly air space? Above the S? Dpazifik w? During the Second World War. Flying to the choice of f.. . more>>
- You’ll be amazed at the exquisite detail of the aircraft, cockpits and scenery
- Fly in the most amazing flying machines of the era, from the Corsair and Hellcat to the Mitsubishi Zero
- Jungle hillsides and majestic coral reefs are yours to explore as you face off agianst the enemy over Papua New Guinea, The Marianas Trench and Midway Island
- Complete your mission goals and battle in campaigns based on 10 actual historical events during the war
- Enhanced 3D objects and high-resolution terrain combine with incredible weather effects and sound, to bring you the ultimate in WWII realism!
This product can be bought at Amazon for $48.09 -> here is the link: Microsoft Combat Flight Simulator 2: Pacific Theater
I M? he had to run it, but close? Lich successful. I’m running a AMD/K6-2 (350) CPU with 64 MB of RAM and a Diamond Monster 3D II accelerator, with a Flight Stick Pro and pedals. Under the package, I meet all requirements. My operating system is Microsoft’s Windows ME.
CFS2 loaded twice, but when I play k? it nnte not over load the scene when my screen went black tries. The machine locked up! Schlie? Lich after he tried to f the new drivers? R the Diamond Monster I on their europ?’s Location found, I have it running properly.
w? gestures but think that Microsoft with all their skills k? nnte a game without so many f? trouble? lead w? rde design.
The game is good. The graphics are excellent, sound good, and the scenery is very good. The game l? Runs smoothly if you run it at last. I found some errors, nat? Of course.
First, I like the L? Stigen cones that point you in the nearby enemy. They are certainly not realistic. Also, the enemy planes flit? Over in a hour? Grows unrealistic fashion, and it unrealistic to pursue seriously. Also closing at a combined speed of 600 miles per hour, should another airplane is easy to follow. However, Microsoft is not guilty than many other designers simulation in such matters.
modeling of aircraft flight performance is not bad, but not quite realistic, with. I took a F6F “Hellcat” up to 10,000 feet? Above the Kwajalein Atoll, a runway that I’m flying out, and put them into a spin. This is a plane, fly to the relatively simple (I solo in 1946 into the real thing.) Although I came the other way around, and the rudder controls was properly neutralized, w rde? Not recover it from the spin and go into a dive. The F6F was not known daf? R, that poor spinning properties.
also drop your gear at a few hundred miles an hour is not the result of “competent dam gear?.” should pilots often did it in the battle for a pl get? tzliche reduction in speed.
Another problem is the slow reaction of the machine gun, the gun button. And when the button is released, it Unexplained f? Rlicherweise to keep burning? R a couple or three seconds.
copywriter, the pilot’s manual fell into the same trap as everyone else wrote in the comparison of the F6F with the F4U Corsair. They claimed that the F6F “far from the fastest U.S. K? Fighters,” but that it was in the top position of the American K? Fighters in the Pacific, together with the Vought Corsair. ” They claim that H f? Top speed? R the Hellcat of 327 knots (376 mph) at 17 300 foot, w? While the Corsair with a H? Top speed of credited 363 knots (417 mph) at 19 900 foot , making the Corsair seem much faster. You get more hours? Ren such unfair comparisons. ?
I have news f r she was: an article in Flight Journal last year by Corky Meyer (a Grumman test pilot) described a side by side test of the Corsair and Hellcat, with full power on the same H height? (they had the same R2800, 2,000 hp Pratt & Whitney engine, but different shot numbers) it had the carrying out of the same speed? over the ground, but the Corsair that was on an h? here by the difference in speed arrangement of the Pitot probe. Because of its
Fl? gel design, had the Corsair a more rapid introduction? Channel characteristic than the Hellcat. It was also more unstable and difficult to fly, and taxiing and landing visibility was hampered by the long engine nacelle. They called it the “Ensign Eliminator.” Otherwise they were very uniform? Strength matched in their performance characteristics.
writers call the Corsair “big, hard and fast,” it nat? of course, but the F6F pilots shot down? over 70 percent of all air-to-air kills in the Pacific War. It is rated well below aircraft, at the desk jockeys.
Here are some numbers: The Hellcat is credited with 5156 w victories during the Second World War and was shot down Hellcat pilots shot down 306 enemy aircraft 5 or more (the definition of an “ace.”) Corsairs 2140 enemy? and made only 93 aces, although they serve in the Pacific enbtered first. The famous celebrities of Mustang was credited with only 296 kills and made just 5 aces. The small F4F “Wildcat”, with 1006 t? Tet 58 aces made, and was bad mouth as obsolete when the war ended early. Considering only the results, one wonders noticed by the critics.
But this is a beautiful NES game. The graphics are there to f with Jane’s WWII Fighters, and it is a source of joy? R be a lot of people.
Joseph Pierre, USN (Ret)
Joseph H Pierre
October 21st, 2010
Just because it’s hot? T that the platform f? R the game is 95,98, ME
does not mean it will not run on XP! I have a Windows XP Home Edition
and l? Runs good!
737 Jet
October 21st, 2010
This is a game for? R an air combat simulator mother. It has everything. It does however show some signs of having been before the final insurance valid for fine-tuning was made complete. The vessel? Hl the historical atmosphere is? Re not as good as in Combat Flight Simulator 1 (the war in Europe). So many good photos of the action in the Pacific are Available? GBar, some in color, that the choice of comic images in the background f? Cases and move the history of Feldz? GE forward is unnecessary? TIG and disappointed deceptive. Information such as launch, landing and berziehgeschwindigkeiten is? Missing (or hard to find). The aircraft graphics are absolutely outstanding. Landscape is a bit boring – endless blue skies and tropical blue tropical water. Carrier landings are a lot of fun and damn hard – very hard to f r a Anf nger?. It is not true that you ben a super fast super computer transparent?, But if you do not you need a top of the line graphics card with built accelorator RAM. My setup, if so Combat Flight Simulator 1 (War in Europe) executed? Leads shows landscape that is very photographic presumeable derived from digitally processed photos. These games “landscape seems to be completely deleted -. Painted very well although I get some geringf dependent Z and like totally miss the glass-smooth action I with the war in Europe version without getting my very good graphics accelerator, it?. ?. w re unplayable weather and cloud effects are totally awesome – Hundek vapors in the early morning dusk in a storm is a blast Basically -?. a good game f r Simulator enthusiasts But, as is typical in Filmgesch ft?.? much of what was part of a unique left out part two of that which it is replaced very cool, but it lacks class if you have never flown in a simulator -… get Combat Flight Simulator One If you never believed themselves capable of is interested in computer game (thought it was f r teenager?) – Combat Flight Simulator get one if your are inerested in history -.. get part one of this game is very good – but it’s a game, Combat Flight Simulator One is an experience (and not take so much damn space on the hard disk)
Joann Simon
October 21st, 2010
Just the equivalent value, this game is a blast to play. F? R real escape enthusaists it offers very accurate graphics and flight simulation. F? R casual drivers the gameplay can vote on each level allow the pilot to enjoy the game? En. But. . Let’s dig into the details:
Graphics:
Overall very nice. If the graphics level, the detail is on amazing, especially on the plane. The ground detail is good but not very exciting – nally one is pretty much in the middle of the Pacific. My main criticism is that the details? Over the ships to be better k? JH. If you are on the deck of a Flugzeugtr? Gers are it is no other aircraft on the deck and the details of the tower not so big.
Gameplay: The game makes
it easy to get quickly into the air. That’s big thing if you do not like the play? Over an entire f missing? Choose or do not have the time to start a full campaign? Taken over.
The aircraft is quite different vessels? have hl (and sound), but none of them are very difficult to fly. However, the level to get back on the ground is another story. With a little? Advertising you will be able to start on a long runway and land fairly easily, but settling on the deck of a carrier? Gers takes much practice. If you wind / storm to the mix Add sawing, it is even more difficult. Personal Productivity Personal I found the development of these F? One of the beautiful skills? Sweetest parts of the game.
The realism of the flight and Sch? the are just great. If your aircraft in air combat is very different dam fly? Damaged. Because of the realistic damage model, beautiful coat the fragility? Of its aircraft.
I have not found the story interesting and the comic sequences between the sequences were not very much? convincingly. This aspect of the game was not too much interest f? r me first, so I do not have that concern.
closing? Lich mission builder is very well done. If you tired of receiving the bearing campaigns, k? The Mission Builder you can shoot and throw something together in a few minutes.
Other notes:
I recommend picking a force feedback joystick f r that game. After we add a tremendous amount to the gameplay.
Douglas Welzel
October 21st, 2010
. . . So I guess I must wait. . . CFS3? maybe. Seems strange that because torpedo planes played so big role on both sides w e? During the air war in the Pacific. It is a pity that then put in a flight simulator that theater w? Rde not even a model WWII torpedo bombers. Oh yes, I’m just a little with unerf? Disappointed expectations llten uscht?, But so what. The game never promised anything more than a flight sim will be presentation of the main Japanese and American warplanes. And it is, and it does really well. Microsoft
previous entry was CFS, which displayed the Europ? sized air war. Gamers had a lot of complaints and it is obvious that Microsoft listened and learned. One of the gr? Th criticisms of the first game was the graphics. The graphics here are beautiful? N. The? U? Ere the levels are sufficient and weathered? Lflecken and rail? Powder band appears. Looking nice little details like moving Vord? Cher, Klappfl? Gel and R? Of which, in turn. The damage model is very good. Einschussl appear? Cher, when fired, and the skin beautiful lt exposing itself to lower limits? Be. Parts fall on the degree of Besch? Ending and looking f? For these visual cues. Black smoke streaming from the enemy means that he f away from the window? R sure, but sprayed gray means that he is still in the game. The same applies f? R. ? Help ligem smoke smudging the screen, out of a jam! The fact that k? You can this is a relief, and is a function that was previously lacking. Terrain, as it is – blue sky, blue sea – is rendered still loving. Different types of weather and time of day are also listed? Leads.
The flight modeling is adjustable from mild to beg? receiver to hard and very realistic. Try to fly with a certain degree of realism and the planes react according to their St? Strengths and swans Chen. Schlie? En At a zero of its six in your Wildcat, lining him up, and then look surprised as he zooms pl? Tzlich climb into an outlet that you can never keep up k?, And then watching in horror as you the narrow circle he draws browse ran to the rear. Flying the Wildcat Your St? Strength is your weight. Push the nose down and dive into the enemy’s fighting force, ripping through them with guns. Just keep going, however, because your dead in a dogfight. There are several types of missions, a semi-dynamic campaign, battleships, and other Tr ger level decisions, the most important “Whistling Death” – The Corsair. All this goes hand in hand to provide r f a satisfying flight sim fans the most -? F r a while. And therein lies the rub. Just for Girls r a little while before you start to get a vessel? Hl of what h tte? Be k? Can and will notice small things missing. Why did they not give the bottle? Gelme? Men more commands? What is the objective of this mission? and ck to my pioneered originally beef – why are not more aircraft to fly? I m? RIGHTS drop torpedoes!
Anonymous
October 21st, 2010